Day 3 – our presuppositions
Let us then, my friends, beware lest our opinions come between us
and our God, between us and our neighbor,
between us and our better selves. Let us be
jealous that the human shall not obscure the
divine. –GEORGE
MACDONALD
These, then, are our assumptions as we begin this leg of our
journey:
2. God
created the universe, including us.
3. God is
omnipotent, active, volitional, sovereign, omniscient, moral, righteous,
holy, revelatory, relational, transcendent, gracious, just, loving,
purposeful, omnipresent, relevant, experiential, and transforming.
These
are the conclusions we reached during the first and second legs of our journey.
Now, on the third, we will use them as the springboard to our study of human
nature. As we self-reflect, we will assume that God exists and that His nature
is as summarized above.
By starting with these assumptions, we may at times find ourselves
in direct opposition to what many textbooks of psychology, sociology, and
anthropology tell us. The reason is simple: all too often these textbooks are
written from the naturalistic point of view. The existence of God is assumed
false throughout the writing process, and man's belief in Him is attributed to
a combination of ignorance, instincts, and illness. These books—more
accurately, the authors of these books—self-reflect through the lens of
naturalism. They may not say it directly or even indirectly, but do not be
misled. Many of them do not believe in God. Their analysis of human nature is
based on this creed: the atheist is right and the theist wrong.¹
I cannot go in that direction, for I have a firm and abiding
belief in the existence of God. I believe that reality includes both the
natural and the supernatural, and this will color every page hereafter. Unlike
the atheistic textbooks, I will acknowledge my bias openly and unashamedly. I
respect the scholarship of the naturalists and will embrace the points on which
we agree. But when their view of human nature contradicts my belief in God, I
will head in another direction. I will tightly embrace the three statements at
the start of today's reading, for I do believe in God and in such a God.
That I will use a supernatural lens in the pages to follow should
come as no surprise. I have written two books explaining the reasons why.
SELF-REFLECT
With each of the statements below, answer one of
the following:
a. I believe this.
b. I don’t believe this.
c. I’m not sure about
this.
2. God created the universe.
3. God created me.
4. God is omnipotent.
5. God is active.
6. God is volitional.
7. God is sovereign.
8. God is omniscient.
9. God is moral.
10. God is righteous.
11. God is holy.
12. God is revelatory.
13. God is relational.
14. God is transcendent.
15. God is gracious.
16. God is just.
17. God is loving.
18. God is purposeful.
19. God is omnipresent.
20. God is relevant.
21. God is experiential.
22. God is transforming.
¹Richard Featherstone
from the
University of Northern Iowa and Katie L. Sorrell
from the
University of Wisconsin published
online in 2007 a comparison of
sociology textbooks. The following is an excerpt from the abstract:
This article provides a content analysis of 31 introductory sociology textbooks published between 2003 and 2006… Our analysis
reveals that 20 (65%) of the 31 textbooks in our study present only
secularization theory, while seven (23%) of the textbooks cover both
secularization theory and religious economies theory. We assess the ramifications
of such a lopsided arrangement and conclude by encouraging a more open dialogue
on this issue.
Anthropology textbooks also
have an atheistic bias, the extent of which is summarized by Ohio science
professor Jerry Bergman:
Probably one of the most serious and common areas of censorship of
support for the intelligent design world view and theism in general is from textbooks.
The writer’s review of over 200 textbooks found that virtually all of them
assume a priori that God does not exist, rarely even adopting the agnostic
position.
In Theistic Psychology (an
online publication), Leon James, Professor of Psychology at the University of
Hawaii, admits that “an atheistic science and an atheistic psychology
literature has developed… The effort has been very intense to eradicate the
concepts of God and the afterlife from science.”
Daily Quotation
George MacDonald in
Michael Phillips, ed., Your Life in Christ (Minneapolis: Bethany House,
2005), 213.
No comments:
Post a Comment